OpenClaw Hosting: Best Providers + Deployment Guide (2026)
A comprehensive comparison of the top OpenClaw hosting providers, with deployment walkthroughs and pricing analysis.
Introduction
Deploying OpenClaw agents requires infrastructure purpose-built for autonomous workloads. Unlike traditional web hosting, agent hosting demands persistent compute, sandbox isolation, real-time event loops, and secure credential management. Choosing the wrong provider leads to cold-start latency, unpredictable costs, and agents that fail silently in production.
This guide compares the top OpenClaw hosting providers in 2026, walks through a production deployment step by step, and breaks down the real costs so you can make an informed decision. Whether you are running a single SEO auditing agent or orchestrating a fleet of customer-support bots, the right host is the foundation of reliability.
What to Look for in OpenClaw Hosting
Not every cloud platform is suited for agent workloads. Here are the criteria that matter most when evaluating an OpenClaw host.
Sandbox isolation is non-negotiable. Your agents execute arbitrary tool calls, browser actions, and API requests. The host must provide secure sandboxing so a misbehaving agent cannot affect other tenants or your own infrastructure.
Persistent compute keeps agents alive between invocations. Serverless functions with 30-second timeouts are a poor fit for agents that run multi-step workflows over minutes or hours. Look for hosts that offer long-running containers or dedicated instances.
Observability and logging let you debug agent behavior after the fact. The best providers offer structured logs, token-usage dashboards, and trace-level replays of every tool call your agent made.
Scaling model determines how costs behave under load. Some hosts charge per agent-minute, others per request, and a few offer flat tiers. Understanding the billing model prevents surprise invoices.
Top Providers Compared
After testing fourteen providers across latency, uptime, developer experience, and cost, three stood out for different use cases.
ClawCloud is the market leader for teams that need enterprise-grade reliability. Their managed infrastructure provides auto-scaling, dedicated GPU instances for vision-enabled agents, and a 99.99% uptime SLA. The dashboard includes built-in monitoring with token burn-rate alerts. Best for mid-to-large teams running production agent fleets. Check out their listing on our hosting directory for integration details.
AgentDeploy targets indie developers and early-stage startups. Their free tier includes 1,000 agent-minutes per month, and paid plans start at $19/mo. The CLI is excellent, with one-command deploys from a local OpenClaw project. Trade-off: fewer regions and no GPU instances.
NimbusAgents occupies the high-end niche with bare-metal GPU nodes and sub-50ms cold starts. Ideal for latency-sensitive agents handling real-time customer interactions. Pricing is premium, starting at $99/mo, but you get dedicated resources and priority support.
Deployment Walkthrough
Getting an OpenClaw agent running on ClawCloud takes under five minutes. Start by installing the CLI, authenticating, and pushing your agent config.
First, ensure your agent project has a valid openclaw.config.ts at the root. This file declares your agent's name, entry point, environment variables, and resource requirements. Then run claw deploy from the project directory. The CLI builds a container image, pushes it to the registry, and provisions a sandbox. You will see a live URL within seconds.
For other providers, the workflow is similar: define the config, authenticate via CLI or dashboard, and deploy. The key difference is how each provider handles secrets, networking, and scaling policies.
Pricing Comparison
| Provider | Free Tier | Starting Price | Per-Agent-Minute | GPU Support |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ClawCloud | None | $29/mo | $0.002 | Yes |
| AgentDeploy | 1,000 min/mo | $19/mo | $0.003 | No |
| NimbusAgents | None | $99/mo | $0.0015 | Yes (dedicated) |
For most teams, ClawCloud offers the best balance of features and cost. Solo developers may prefer AgentDeploy's free tier. If latency is your primary constraint, NimbusAgents justifies the premium.
Browse all verified hosting providers on our hosting directory to see real user reviews, integration lists, and feature comparisons.
Conclusion
The OpenClaw hosting landscape has matured significantly in 2026. All three providers covered here deliver production-ready infrastructure, but they serve different segments. Start with the free tier or lowest plan, measure your agent's resource profile, and scale from there. The deployment checklist we offer in our newsletter covers security hardening, sandbox permissions, and monitoring setup to help you go from first deploy to production confidence.